MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221078752 · doi:10.18280/ts.390102

Partial Update Simplified Fast Transversal Filter Algorithms for Acoustic Echo Cancellation

2022· article· en· W4221078752 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohamed Amine Ramdane, Ahmed Benallal, Mountassar Maamoun, Islam Hassani

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransversal (combinatorics)AlgorithmReduction (mathematics)Filter (signal processing)Computational complexity theoryComputer scienceConvergence (economics)Adaptive filterContext (archaeology)Echo (communications protocol)Tracking (education)MathematicsComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robust algorithms applied in Acoustic Echo Cancellation systems present an excessive calculation load that has to be minimized. In the present paper, we propose two different low complexity fast least squares algorithms, called Partial Update Simplified Fast Transversal Filter (PU-SMFTF) algorithm and Reduced Partial Update Simplified Fast Transversal Filter (RPU-SMFTF) algorithm. The first algorithm reduces the computational complexity in both filtering and prediction parts using the M-Max method for coefficients selection. Moreover, the second algorithm applies the partial update technique on the filtering part, joined to the P-size forward predictor, to get more complexity reduction. The obtained results show a computational complexity reduction from (7L+8) to (L+6M+8) and from (7L+8) to (L+M+4P+17) for the PU-SMFTF algorithm and RPU-SMFTF algorithm, respectively compared to the original Simplified Fast Transversal Filter (SMFTF). Furthermore, experiments picked out in the context of acoustic echo cancellation, have demonstrated that the proposed algorithms provide better convergence speed, good tracking capability and steady-state performances than the NLMS and SMFTF algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207