Evidence for lithospheric and sublithospheric anisotropy of the eastern Canadian Shield and its margins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The eastern Canadian Shield and its margins represent an excellent natural laboratory to study the formation and evolution of continental lithosphere, as the rocks and structures preserve approximately 4 billion years of geological history. The core of the continent is made up of several large Archean cratonic blocks and continental fragments, welded together by Paleoproterozoic mobile belts. Subsequent Proterozoic orogenesis added to the southern and eastern margins, building the Laurentian landmass, and a series of Wilson cycles established the form of the continent we see today. Laurentian lithosphere is characterized in seismic tomography by a thick, seismically fast continental keel, representing cold temperatures and a depleted composition, whereas the Phanerozoic margins have slower seismic wavespeeds and a thinner lithosphere. Over the last several decades, numerous seismic anisotropy measurements have been used to investigate lithospheric and sublithospheric fabrics beneath the region. Shear wave splitting shows strong lateral variability in both the strength and fast-polarisation orientation of the anisotropy, and measurements at closely-spaced stations suggest a significant lithospheric component as well as a likely sublithospheric contribution. Recent regional and continental-scale surface wave tomography studies allow for some depth constraint on the azimuthal anisotropy, which appears pervasive, but varying, for different depth ranges within the lithosphere and asthenosphere. We compare the measurements from shear wave splitting and surface wave tomography with several geological and geophysical observations that could relate to anisotropic fabric, such as surface tectonic boundaries, magnetic anomalies, absolute plate-motion directions and mantle flow patterns from global geodynamic models. We use these comparisons to investigate the relative contributions to the seismic anisotropy observed across the region from lithospheric deformation, basal shear of the North American plate, and active mantle convection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".