From virtual environment to real observations: short-term hydrological forecasts with an Artificial Neural Network model.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine learning model approaches for hydrological forecasts are nowadays common in research. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) is one of the most popular due to its good performance on watersheds with different hydrologic regimes and over several timescales. A short-term (1 to 7 days ahead) forecast model was explored to predict streamflow. This study focused on the summer season defined from May to October. Cross-validation was done over a period of 16 years, each time keeping a single year as a validation set. The ANN model was parameterized with a single hidden layer of 6 neurons. It was developed in a virtual environment based on datasets generated by the physically based distributed hydrological model Hydrotel (Fortin et al., 2012). In a preliminary analysis, several combinations of inputs were assessed, the best combining precipitation and temperature with surface soil moisture and antecedent streamflow. Different spatial discretizations were compared. A semi-distributed discretization was selected to facilitate transferring the ANN model from a virtual environment to real observations such as remote sensing soil moisture products or ground station time series. Four watersheds were under study: the Au Saumon and Magog watersheds located in south Québec (Canada); the Androscoggin watershed in Maine (USA); and the Susquehanna watershed located in New-York and Pennsylvania (USA). All but the Susquehanna watershed are mainly forested, while the latter has a 57% forest cover. To evaluate whether a model with a data-driven structure can mimic a deterministic model, ANN and Hydrotel simulated flows were compared. Results confirm that the ANN model can reproduce streamflow output from Hydrotel with confidence. Soil moisture observation stations were deployed in the Au Saumon and Magog watersheds during the summers 2018 to 2021. Meteorological data were extracted from the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. As the period of availability of observed data is short, the ANN model was trained in a virtual environment. Two validations were done: one in the virtual environment and one using real soil moisture observations and flows. The number and locations of the soil moisture probes slightly differed during each of the four summers. Therefore, four models were trained depending on the number of probes and their location. Results highlight that location of the soil moisture probes has a large influence on the ANN streamflow outputs and identifies more representative sub-regions of the watershed. The use of remote sensing data as inputs of the ANN model is promising. Soil moisture datasets from SMOS and SMAP missions are available for the four watersheds under study, although downscaling approaches should be applied to bring the spatial resolution of those products at the watershed scale. One other future lead could be the development of a semi-distributed ANN model in virtual environment based on a restricted selection of hydrological units based on physiographic characteristics. The future L-band NiSAR product could be relevant for this purpose, having a finer spatial resolution compared to SMAP and SMOS and a better penetration of the signal in forested areas than C-band SAR satellites such as Sentinel-1 and the Radarsat Constellation Mission.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".