MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4221093217 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu22-6077

Cenozoic relative movements of Greenland and North America by closure of the North Atlantic-Arctic plate circuit: The Labrador Sea, Davis Strait, Baffin Bay, and Eurekan Orogen

2022· preprint· en· W4221093217 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Annabel Causer, Graeme Eagles, Lucía Pérez‐Díaz, Jürgen Adam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayGeologyOceanographyArcticNorth American PlatePlate tectonicsCenozoicPaleontologySverdrupCretaceousTectonicsStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cretaceous to earliest Oligocene plate motions between Greenland and North America are only modellable at high resolution from a short-lived (61-42 Ma) sequence of magnetic isochrons in the Labrador Sea. Understanding them at other times is hampered by interpretational conflicts and low resolution in geoscientific observations of the Labrador Sea, Davis Strait, Baffin Bay, and Eurekan Orogen. To better contextualize these observations, we build and manipulate models of North America-Eurasia and Eurasia-Greenland divergence in order to depict post-84 Ma North American-Greenland motions at quantified high resolution. Among our findings, we show that the North American-Eurasian plate boundary propagated northwards, leading the continental shelves in the Labrador Sea to separate by 74-72 Ma and in Baffin Bay later, at around 63 Ma, and that field evidence for the Eurekan Orogeny having occurred in two distinct phases is directly related to a 46 Ma change in Greenland-North American plate motion parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.639
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→