MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221095179 · doi:10.1111/ibi.13055

Vocal traits of shorebird chicks are related to body mass and sex

2022· article· en· W4221095179 on OpenAlex
Kristal N. Kostoglou, Edward H. Miller, Michael A. Weston, David R. Wilson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIbis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersHolsworth Wildlife Research Endowment
KeywordsPrecocialCharadriusPloverSandpiperBiologyVocal communicationZoologyAlarm signalCalidrisALARMEcologyDemographyCommunicationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Acoustic communication is critical during early life phases in precocial birds; for example, adult alarm calls can elicit antipredator behaviour in young, and chick vocalizations can communicate information to parents about chick identity, condition, location, sex or age. We opportunistically recorded Red‐capped Plover Charadrius ruficapillus and Southern Masked Lapwing Vanellus miles novaehollandiae distress calls of chicks while they were in the hand and analysed the calls to determine whether call structure is related to sex or body mass (a proxy for age). Our study provides the first evidence for charadriid chicks of (1) a sexual difference in call structure and rate and (2) gradual growth‐related changes in call structure and rate, across chicks. We provide a foundation for further studies of shorebird vocalizations during growth, which may elucidate the development and functional significance of such vocalizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it