Hornet 40: Network dataset of geographically placed honeypots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deception technologies, and honeypots in particular, have been used for decades to understand how cyber attacks and attackers work. A myriad of factors impact the effectiveness of a honeypot. However, very few is known about the impact of the geographical location of honeypots on the amount and type of attacks. Hornet 40 is the first dataset designed to help understand how the geolocation of honeypots may impact the inflow of network attacks. The data consists of network flows in binary and text format, with up to 118 features, including 480 bytes of the content of each flow. They were created using the Argus flow collector. The passive honeypots are IP addresses connected to the Internet and do not have any honeypot software running, so attacks are not interactive. The data was collected from identically configured honeypot servers in eight locations: Amsterdam, Bangalore, Frankfurt, London, New York, San Francisco, Singapore, and Toronto. The dataset contains over 4.7 million network flows collected during forty days throughout April, May, and June 2021.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".