MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221113181 · doi:10.3389/fmats.2022.864264

Experimental Study on Direct Tensile Properties of Cemented Paste Backfill

2022· article· en· W4221113181 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTailings Management and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsUltimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceCompressive strengthComposite materialTensile testingSlurryCuring (chemistry)CementitiousCement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cemented paste backfill (CPB) has been increasingly utilized in mines for efficient mineral obtaining and regional ground support. To guarantee the work performance, the mechanical properties of CPB have long been a topic of study among researchers. But the research progress on the tensile strength of CPB is limited, mainly because of the lack of an appropriate test method due to the low tensile strength of CPB. Therefore, instead of the conventional splitting indirect tensile strength test method, a new direct tension test method, which utilizes the specifically designed compression to tension load converter (CTLC) and dog-bone-shaped specimen, has been applied to study the direct tensile properties of CPB. In this study, the direct tensile strength (DTS) of 47 CPB mix designs were measured using CTLC, and the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the corresponding mix design was also tested. The experimental results showed that the increase in the binder content, solid mass content, and curing period led to higher CPB direct tensile strength, and the DTS of CPB was most sensitive to the binder content. Furthermore, the influence of the slurry mass solid content on the tensile strength of CPB was not linear. The influence of the binder content became increasingly notable with the increase in the solid content, especially if the binder content exceeded 75%. The effect of the curing period was found to be rather marginal due to the decreasing amount of un-hydrated cementitious materials left with the increase of the curing period. Overall, the DTS generated using dog-bone specimens and the CTLC apparatus are valid for better mine backfill designs. Finally, a linear correlative between UCS and DTS with a formula in the form of σDT (DTS) = 0.171 σc (UCS) was obtained, and the correlation was sufficient for further calculation of DTS using measured UCS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it