MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221113541 · doi:10.4271/2022-01-0076

A Soiling Mitigation Method to Enhance the Performance of ADAS in Precipitation

2022· article· en· W4221113541 on OpenAlexaff
Wing Yi Pao, Long Li, Martin Agelin‐Chaab

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in Mobility · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle emissions and performance
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVisibilityLens (geology)Environmental scienceWind speedReliability (semiconductor)Computer sciencePrecipitationAutomotive engineeringSimulationMarine engineeringRemote sensingMeteorologyEngineeringGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">The emergence of autonomous driving technology has tremendous mobility and social-economic benefits. Autonomous vehicles (AVs) rely on various sensors for environmental and traffic data. However, the sensor performance and reliability degrade in adverse weather conditions, which poses a challenge to the safety of AVs. Existing active mitigation strategies such as wipers and water jets are active, complex, and expensive to implement. This study investigated soiling mitigation via a passively rotating lens with the goal to maintain Advanced-Driver-Assistance-System (ADAS) sensor visibility in the rain. The concept of rotating lens has merely been lightly explored in the literature but never studied in detail with realistic continuous rain simulation to verify soiling mitigation effectiveness. An optical camera in place of a frontal vehicle ADAS sensor was integrated into a rotating lens for visual characterization. A wind tunnel was used to simulate various wind-driven rain scenarios in both urban and suburban driving speeds. As driving speed in rain increases, sensor reliability and performance exacerbate due to an increase in perceived rain characteristics, including angle and intensity. This investigation studied the correlation of the rotating lens angular velocity at different driving speeds and its effectiveness in mitigating soiling under various perceived rain conditions. The increase in angular velocity resulted in a direct increase in centrifugal force experienced by each raindrop present on the lens; hence, providing a mitigation effect when droplets are spun off. Compared to stationary reference lens, observations from mitigation-enabling rotating lens showed greatly improved clarity from the optical camera frontal view in reduction of environment obstruction and distortion from rain droplets. Image processing results suggested high confidence in combating all droplet sizes and driving-in-rain conditions. This investigation successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of rotating lens as a concept for soiling mitigation and provided insight for enhancing ADAS sensor performance and reliability in adverse weather conditions.</div></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.196

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE International Journal of Advances and Current Practices in MobilitySame topicVehicle emissions and performanceFrench-language works237,207