Chevrolet Bolt Electric Vehicle Model Validated with On-the-Road Data and Applied to Estimating the Benefits of a Multi-Speed Gearbox
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a model for predicting the energy consumption of a 2017 Chevrolet Bolt electric vehicle. The model is validated using 93 measured drive cycles covering in excess of 10,600 kilometres of driving and temperatures from −8 to 32 °C. The mechanical road load acting on the vehicle is calculated via ABC parameters from the publicly available US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Annual Certification Data database. The vehicle model includes wheel diameter, gear ratio, rated electric machine torque and power, 12V accessory load based off measurements, measured electric machine efficiency obtained from a publication from General Motors, and modelled inverter efficiency. Assumptions are made regarding gearbox losses as well. To ensure accuracy under real-world conditions, road grade, temperature effects, and heating and cooling energy are included as well. The model predicts an EPA range of 380 km, which is very close to the 383 km rating. Error is typically around ±10% for the experimental drive cycles used for validation. The presented modelling methodology can be applied to any production battery electric vehicle and used to predict the benefits of utilizing multi-speed gearboxes, wideband gap semiconductor inverters, different electric traction machine designs, and other vehicle design changes. The paper includes an extensive comparison of modelled versus measured results, as well as an analysis of the benefits of a multi-speed gearbox for the vehicle, showing an increase of range of 1.3% (5 km) with a two-speed gearbox.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".