Prediction of compressibility and shear strength behaviour of in-situ cohesive soil from reconstituted clay
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the present study, simplified sample preparation and testing methodology are proposed for reconstituted clay that can predict the strength and deformation behavior of its in-situ state with minimal sample preparation disturbances. Reconstituted clay specimen was prepared in designed mould for each disturbed sample. Later, predetermined proportions of admixtures were mixed to vary the liquid limits. The test results showed that the change in compression index is directly proportional to the change in the liquid limit, moisture content, and the initial void ratio of the soil samples. However, the change in angle of internal friction was inversely proportional to the liquid limit, plasticity index, and clay fraction percentage. Scanning electron microscopy tests provided in-depth insight on the comparable pore and clay flake sizes. The proposed empirical relationships from the test results could reasonably estimate the compressibility and shear strength behavior of the in-situ clay soil from the basic index properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it