Snow accumulation over the world's glaciers (1981-2021) inferred from climate reanalyses and machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The scarcity and limited accuracy of snow and precipitation observation and estimation in high-mountain regions reduce our understanding of climatic-cryospheric processes. Thus, we compared the snow water equivalent (SWE) from winter mass balance observations of 95 glaciers distributed over the Alps, Canada, Central Asia and Scandinavia, with the cumulative gridded precipitation data from the ERA-5 and the MERRA-2 reanalysis products. We propose a machine learning model to downscale the gridded precipitation from the reanalyses to the altitude of the glaciers. The machine learning model is a gradient boosting regressor (GBR), which combines several meteorological variables from the reanalyses (air temperature and relative humidity are also downscaled to the altitude of the glaciers) and topographical parameters. Among the most important variables selected by the GBR model, are the downscaled relative humidity and the downscaled air temperature. These GBR-derived estimates are evaluated against the winter mass balance observations by means of a leave-one-glacier-out cross-validation (site-independent GBR) and a leave-one-season-out cross-validation (season-independent GBR). The estimates downscaled by the GBR show lower biases and higher correlations with the winter mass balance observations than downscaled estimates derived with a lapse-rate-based approach. Finally, the GBR estimates are used to derive SWE trends between 1981 and 2021 at high-altitudes. The trends obtained from the GBRs are more enhanced than those obtained from the gridded precipitation of the reanalyses. When the data is regrouped regionwide, significant trends are only observed for the Alps (positive) and for Scandinavia (negative), while significant positive or negative trends are observed in all the regions when looking locally at single glaciers and specific elevations. Positive (negative) SWE trends are typically observed at higher (lower) elevations, where the impact of rising temperatures is less (more) dominating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".