Early post-operative benefits of a pulmonary valve-sparing strategy during Fallot repair
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Patients undergoing complete repair of tetralogy of Fallot generally have an excellent prognosis. Unfortunately, pulmonary valve reconstruction with a transannular patch is generally required. Resulting pulmonary regurgitation is associated with late right ventricular dysfunction and morbidity. Early pulmonary regurgitation may also be poorly tolerated. This study compares immediate outcomes of non-valved transannular patch repair (NV-TAP) to a valve-sparing (V-Sp) approach. Methods: 67 patients, with tetralogy of Fallot and severe pulmonary annular hypoplasia underwent complete repair between 2010 and 2018.23 patients had a NV-TAP repair while a V-Sp technique was used in 44 patients. Mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, use of inotropes, duration of mechanical ventilation, use and duration of dialysis, chest drainage duration, reinterventions, and postoperative complications were compared. Immediate outcomes were assessed by biological data and postoperative echocardiography. Results: ICU stay was shorter in the V-Sp group (5 days vs 8 days, p = 0.009). At postoperative day 1, Vasoactive Inotropic Score and mean dosage of adrenaline were significantly lower in the V-Sp group. Duration of inotrope use was significantly shorter. Hospital stay, mechanical ventilation, and chest drainage duration, the incidence and duration of dialysis all showed a trend towards being lower in the V-Sp group. Surgical complications were similar despite longer cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp durations. Conclusion: Repair of the native pulmonary valve by a V-Sp technique reduces length of stay in the ICU and the use of inotropic agents in the immediate post-operative period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".