High Quality Phasing Using Linked-Read Whole Genome Sequencing of Patient Cohorts Informs Genetic Understanding of Complex Traits
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Phasing of heterozygous alleles is critical for interpretation of cis -effects of disease-relevant variation. For population studies, phase is often inferred from external data but read-based phasing approaches that span long genomic distances would be more accurate because they enable both genotype and phase to be obtained from a single dataset. To demonstrate how read-based phasing can provide functional insights, we sequenced 477 individuals with Cystic Fibrosis (CF) using linked-read sequencing. We benchmark read-based phasing with different short- and long-read sequencing technologies, prioritize linked-read technology as the most informative and produce a benchmark phase call set from reference sample HG002 for the community. The 477 samples display an average phase block N50 of 4.39 Mb. We use these samples to construct a graph representation of CFTR haplotypes, which facilitates understanding of complex CF alleles. Fine-mapping and phasing of the chr7q35 trypsinogen locus associated with CF meconium ileus demonstrates a 20 kb deletion and a PRSS2 missense variant p.Thr8Ile (rs62473563) independently contribute to meconium ileus risk (p=0.0028, p=0.011, respectively) and are PRSS2 pancreas eQTLs (p=9.5e-7 and p=1.4e-4, respectively), explaining the mechanism by which these polymorphisms contribute to CF. Phase enables access to haplotypes that can be used for genome graph or reference panel construction, identification of cis -effects, and for understanding disease associated loci. The phase information from linked-reads provides a causal explanation for variation at a CF-relevant locus which also has implications for the genetic basis of non-CF pancreatitis to which this locus has been reported to contribute.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".