An Online Zero-Forcing Precoder for Weighted Sum-Rate Maximization in Green CoMP Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following the roadmap of carbon neutrality, wireless communication systems are upgrading to use green energy that comes from renewable sources, e.g., sun, tide, and wind. Due to the volatile arrival of green energy, the on-grid energy is used as a backup for a green coordinated multiple point system. In this work, a weighted sum-rate maximization problem in thegreencoordinated multiple point system is investigated by expecting non-positive consumption of the on-grid energy in the long term. Motivated by the capacity-achieving property and simple implementation, an online zero-forcing dirty paper precoder is proposed to update the precoding matrices by combining statistical learning with the Lyapunov learning technique. A tradeoff relation is theoretically established to show that the long-term weighted sum rate approaches the${\mathcal{ O}}(V)$-neighbor of optimal value while the long-term on-grid energy increases at a rate of${\mathcal{ O}}({\scriptstyle {}^{\scriptstyle \log ^{2}(V)}}\hspace {-0.224em}/\hspace {-0.112em}{\scriptstyle \sqrt {V}})$, where$V$is an introduced control parameter. Numerical results are used to verify the performance of the proposed online adaptive precoder.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".