MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CEACAM1 is a novel culture-compatible surface marker of expanded long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells

2022· article· en· W4221135558 on OpenAlexaff
Unain Ansari, Elisa Tomellini, Jalila Chagraoui, Bernhard Lehnertz, Nadine Mayotte, Marie-Ève Bordeleau, Philippe P. Roux, Guy Sauvageau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood Advances · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisUmbilical cordStem cellCell sortingEx vivoBiologyStem cell markerCell biologyHematopoietic stem cellCord bloodImmunologyCancer researchAndrologyIn vivoFlow cytometryMedicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key Points CEACAM1 is a novel cell surface marker of ex vivo expanded LT-HSCs. Sorting umbilical cord blood cells based on CEACAM1 and known HSC marker expression allows purification of LT-HSCs with improved purity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.388
Threshold uncertainty score0.861

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood AdvancesSame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207