MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bulk charge density wave and electron-phonon coupling in superconducting copper oxychlorides

2022· article· en· W4221142720 on OpenAlexaff
L. Chaix, Blair W. Lebert, Hu Miao, Alessandro Nicolaou, F. Yakhou, H. Cercellier, S. Grenier, N. B. Brookes, A. Sulpice, Satoshi Tsutsui, Alexeï Bosak, Luigi Paolasini, D. Santos-Cottin, Hajime Yamamoto, Ikuya Yamada, Masaki Azuma, T. Nishikubo, Takafumi Yamamoto, M. Katsumata, M. P. M. Dean, M. d’Astuto

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersBrookhaven National LaboratoryBasic Energy SciencesJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceAgence Nationale de la RechercheOffice of ScienceEuropean Synchrotron Radiation FacilityDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsCharge density waveCondensed matter physicsCharge densityCupratePhononScatteringSuperconductivityInelastic scatteringInelastic neutron scatteringCopperElectronDensity of statesPhysicsAtomic physicsMaterials scienceOpticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bulk charge density waves are now reported in nearly all high-temperature superconducting cuprates, with the noticeable exception of one particular family: the copper oxychlorides. Here, we used resonant inelastic x-ray scattering to reveal a bulk charge density waves in these materials. Combining resonant inelastic x-ray scattering with nonresonant inelastic x-ray scattering, we investigate the interplay between the lattice excitations and the charge density wave, and evidence the phonon anomalies of the Cu-O bond-stretching mode at the charge density wave wave vector. We propose that such electron-phonon anomalies occur in the presence of dispersive charge excitations emanating from the charge density wave and interacting with the Cu-O bond-stretching phonon. Our results pave the way for future studies, combining both bulk and surface probes, to investigate the static and dynamical properties of the charge density wave in the copper oxychloride family.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ResearchSame topicPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismFrench-language works237,207