MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4221145795 · doi:10.1007/s10714-022-03027-x

Detection of early-universe gravitational-wave signatures and fundamental physics

2022· review· en· W4221145795 on OpenAlexafffund
Robert R. Caldwell, Yanou Cui, Huai-Ke Guo, Vuk Mandic, Alberto Mariotti, José Miguel No, Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf, Mairi Sakellariadou, Kuver Sinha, Lian-Tao Wang, Graham White, Yue Zhao, Haipeng An, Ligong Bian, Chiara Caprini, Sébastien Clesse, James M. Cline, Giulia Cusin, Bartosz Fornal, Ryusuke Jinno, Benoit Laurent, Noam Levi, Kun-Feng Lyu, M. Martı́nez, A. L. Miller, Diego Redigolo, Claudia Scarlata, Alexander Sevrin, Barmak Shams Es Haghi, Jing Shu, X. Siemens, D. A. Steer, Raman Sundrum, Carlos Tamarit, David Weir, Ke-Pan Xie, F. W. Yang, Siyi Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueGeneral Relativity and Gravitation · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónTsinghua UniversityFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMilner FoundationEuropean Regional Development FundU.S. Department of EnergyNational Institutes of HealthSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsGravitational waveUniverseCosmologyAstronomyPrimordial black holeTheoretical physicsAstrophysicsBinary black hole

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detection of a gravitational-wave signal of non-astrophysical origin would be a landmark discovery, potentially providing a significant clue to some of our most basic, big-picture scientific questions about the Universe. In this white paper, we survey the leading early-Universe mechanisms that may produce a detectable signal-including inflation, phase transitions, topological defects, as well as primordial black holes-and highlight the connections to fundamental physics. We review the complementarity with collider searches for new physics, and multimessenger probes of the large-scale structure of the Universe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeneral Relativity and GravitationSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207