Hyperspectral Pixel Unmixing With Latent Dirichlet Variational Autoencoder
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a method for hyperspectral pixel unmixing. The proposed method assumes that (1) abundances can be encoded as Dirichlet distributions and (2) spectra of endmembers can be represented as multivariate Normal distributions. The method solves the problem of abundance estimation and endmember extraction within a variational autoencoder setting where a Dirichlet bottleneck layer models the abundances, and the decoder performs endmember extraction. The proposed method can also leverage transfer learning paradigm, where the model is only trained on synthetic data containing pixels that are linear combinations of one or more endmembers of interest. In this case, we retrieve endmembers (spectra) from the United States Geological Survey Spectral Library. The model thus trained can be subsequently used to perform pixel unmixing on “real data” that contains a subset of the endmembers used to generated the synthetic data. The model achieves state-of-the-art results on several benchmarks: Cuprite, Urban Hydice and Samson. We also present new synthetic dataset, OnTech-HSI-Syn-21, that can be used to study hyperspectral pixel unmixing methods. We showcase the transfer learning capabilities of the proposed model on Cuprite and OnTech-HSI-Syn-21 datasets. In summary, the proposed method can be applied for pixel unmixing a variety of domains, including agriculture, forestry, mineralogy, analysis of materials, healthcare, etc. Additionally, the proposed method eschews the need for labelled data for training by leveraging the transfer learning paradigm, where the model is trained on synthetic data generated using the endmembers present in the “real” data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".