Learning Progressive Distributed Compression Strategies From Local Channel State Information
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a deep learning framework to design distributed compression strategies in which distributed agents need to compress high-dimensional observations of a source, then send the compressed bits via bandwidth limited links to a fusion center for source reconstruction. Further, we require the compression strategy to be progressive so that it can adapt to the varying link bandwidths between the agents and the fusion center. Moreover, to ensure scalability, we investigate strategies that depend only on the local channel state information (CSI) at each agent. Toward this end, we use a data-driven approach in which the progressive linear combination and uniform quantization strategy at each agent are trained as a function of its local CSI. To deal with the challenges of modeling the quantization operations (which always produce zero gradients in the training of neural networks), we propose a novel approach of exploiting the statistics of the batch training data to set the dynamic ranges of the uniform quantizers. Numerically, we show that the proposed distributed estimation strategy designed with only local CSI can significantly reduce the signaling overhead and can achieve a lower mean-squared error distortion for source reconstruction than state-of-the-art designs that require global CSI at comparable overall communication cost.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".