Precise Q value measurements of $^{112,113}$Ag and $^{115}$Cd with the Canadian Penning trap for evaluation of potential ultra-low Q value $β$-decays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ultra-low Q value $β$-decay can occur from a parent nuclide to an excited state in the daughter with $Q_{UL}$ <1 keV. These decays are of interest for nuclear $β$-decay theory and as potential candidates in neutrino mass determination experiments. To date, only one ultra-low Q value $β$-decay has been observed -- that of $^{115}$In with $Q_β$ = 147(10) eV. A number of other potential candidates exist, but improved mass measurements are necessary to determine if the decays are energetically allowed and, in fact, ultra-low. We performed precise $β$-decay Q value measurements of $^{112,113}$Ag and $^{115}$Cd and combined them with nuclear energy level data for the daughter isotopes to determine if the potential UL Q value $β$-decay branches of $^{112,113}$Ag and $^{115}$Cd are energetically allowed and <1 keV. The Canadian Penning Trap at ANL was used to measure the cyclotron frequency ratios of singly-charged $^{112,113}$Ag and $^{115}$Cd ions with respect to their daughters. From these measurements, the ground-state $β$-decay Q values were obtained. The $^{112}$Ag, $^{113}$Ag, and $^{115}$Cd $β$-decay Q values were measured to be 3990.16(22) keV, 2085.7(4.6) keV, and 1451.36(34) keV, respectively. These results were compared to energies of excited states in $^{112}$Cd at 3997.75(14) keV, $^{113}$Cd at 2015.6(2.5) and 2080(10) keV, and $^{115}$In at 1448.787(9) keV, resulting in $Q_{\textrm{UL}}$ values of --7.59(26) keV, 6(11) keV, and 2.57(34) keV, respectively. The potential UL Q value decays of $^{112}$Ag and $^{115}$Cd have been ruled out. $^{113}$Ag is still a possible candidate until a more precise measurement of the 2080(10) keV, 1/2$^{+}$ state of $^{113}$Cd is available. In the course of this work we have found the ground state mass of $^{113}$Ag reported in the 2020AME to be lower than our measurement by 69(17) keV (a 4$σ$ discrepancy).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".