MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223411577 · doi:10.4171/aihpd/116

Combinatorial expression of the fundamental second kind differential on an algebraic curve

2022· article· en· W4223411577 on OpenAlex
Bertrand Eynard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré D Combinatorics Physics and their Interactions · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPolynomial and algebraic computation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les TechnologiesAgence Nationale de la RechercheEuropean CommissionCentre de Recherches Mathématiques
KeywordsDifferential (mechanical device)MathematicsAlgebraic expressionExpression (computer science)Algebraic numberAlgebra over a fieldDifferential algebraic geometryPure mathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysisDifferential equationOrdinary differential equationDifferential algebraic equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The zero locus of a bivariate polynomial P(x,y)=0 defines a compact Riemann surface \Sigma . The fundamental second kind differential is a symmetric 1\otimes 1 -form on \Sigma\times\Sigma that has a double pole at coinciding points and no other pole. As its name indicates, this is one of the most important geometric objects on a Riemann surface. Here we give a rational expression in terms of combinatorics of the Newton's polygon of P , involving only integer combinations of products of coefficients of P . Since the expression uses only combinatorics, the coefficients are in the same field as the coefficients of P .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.827

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it