MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223420375 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)00369-5

Reduction of dietary sodium to less than 100 mmol in heart failure (SODIUM-HF): an international, open-label, randomised, controlled trial

2022· article· en· W4223420375 on OpenAlexaff
Justin A. Ezekowitz, Eloisa Colin-Ramírez, Heather J. Ross, Jorge Escobedo, Peter S. Macdonald, Richard W. Troughton, Clara Saldarriaga, Wendimagegn Alemayehu, Finlay A. McAlister, JoAnne Arcand, J. Atherton, Robert N. Doughty, Milan Gupta, Jonathan G. Howlett, Shahin Jaffer, Andrea Lavoie, Mayanna Lund, Thomas H. Marwick, Robert S. McKelvie, Gordon W. Moe, A. Shekhar Pandey, Liane Porepa, Miroslaw Rajda, Haunnah Rheault, Jitendra Singh, Mustafa Toma, Sean Virani, Shelley Zieroth

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsSt. Paul's HospitalRed Deer Regional HospitalQueen Elizabeth II Health Sciences CentreSouthlake Regional Health CenterSt. Boniface HospitalSt. Michael's HospitalUniversity of British ColumbiaFoothills Medical CentreCambridge Cardiac Care CentreGenome PrairieVancouver General HospitalUniversity of CalgaryOntario Tech UniversityHamilton Health SciencesToronto General HospitalCanadian VIGOUR CentreUniversity of AlbertaBrampton Civic Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHeart failureAdverse effectPopulationInternal medicineRandomized controlled trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations173
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207