A novel method for drug-target interaction prediction based on graph transformers model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background:drug-target interactions prediction(DTIs) becomes more and moreimportant for accelerating drug research and drug repositioning. drug-targetinteraction network is a typical model for DTIs prediction. As many differenttypes of relationships exist between drug and target, drug-target interactionnetwork can be used for modeling drug-target interaction relationship. Recentworks on drug-target interaction network are mostly concentrate on drug node ortarget node and neglecting the relationships between drug-target. Results:We propose a novel prediction method for modeling the relationshipbetween drug and target independently. Firstly, we use different level relationshipsof drugs and targets to construct feature of drug-target interaction. Then, we useline graph to model drug-target interaction. After that, we introduce graphtransformer network to predict drug-target interaction. Conclusions:We introduce line graph to model the relationship between drug andtarget. After transformed drug-target interaction from links into nodes, we usegraph transformer network to fulfill drug-target interaction prediction task. Keywords: drug-target interaction; graph attention network; line graph
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".