Reduction of Complexity Design of SAC OCDMA Systems by Utilizing Diagonal Permutation Shift (DPS) Codes with Single Photodiode (SPD) Detection Technique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a diagonal permutation code is presented for spectral amplitude coding optical code division multiple access (SAC-OCDMA) employing a single photodiode (SPD) detection technique. It is characterized by practical code length and ideal in-phase cross correlation (CC) that results in multiple access interference (MAI) suppression. A diagonal permutation shift (DPS) code can be constructed using both prime codes and some matrix operations. In addition, it can be easily implemented as it exists for prime numbers P, which limits the addressing probability of codes to P2. Fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) are used for code encoding and decoding. Simulation analysis that calibrates with BER, Q-factor, and eye diagram proves that DPS code using SPD technique is able to maintain error free transmission compared to the complementary detection scheme (CDS) technique. It is reported that a reduction of fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sets by 41.6% was achieved for SPD over CDS techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".