The features of haloacetic acid oxidation that contribute to stratospheric ozone depletion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Environmental context Due to The Montreal Protocol, stratospheric ozone concentration is slowly regenerating, however, the recovery rate is slower than predicted by photochemical models. FTIR spectroscopy together with quantum chemical calculations confirmed that ozone reacts with halogenated acids adsorbed at a model aerosol surface. Reactions occur at low temperatures without photochemical activation with formation of halogen oxides that are known to promote catalytic cycles of ozone depletion. Abstract The present work addresses the problem of stratospheric ozone depletion. While gas phase and photochemically induced reactions of ozone are well studied, the mechanisms of heterogeneous O3 interactions with different halogenated species still remain uncertain. An in situ FTIR investigation of low-temperature heterogeneous reactions of ozone and haloacetic acids in conditions close to stratospheric was performed and supported by ab initio quantum chemical calculations. Products of ozone reaction with differently chlorine and bromine-substituted acetic acids were identified and possible reactions pathways were suggested. Ozone can attach to a carbon atom to release a halogen atom that forms a halogen oxide. Halogen oxide in its turn can take part in the catalytic cycles of ozone depletion. Suggested reaction pathways leading to the additional release of the chlorine oxides can enhance the atmospheric models that calculate ozone concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".