Route to transition in propulsive performance of oscillating foil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transition in the propulsive performance and vortex synchronization of an oscillating foil in a combined heaving and pitching motion is numerically investigated at a range of reduced frequencies (0.16 $\ensuremath{\le}{f}^{*}\ensuremath{\le}$ 0.64), phase offsets (${0}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ $\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\le}$ ${315}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$), and Reynolds number ($1000\ensuremath{\le}\text{Re}\ensuremath{\le}16\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}000$). Focusing on the common case of $\text{Re}=1000$, the drag to thrust transition is identified on a $\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{-}{f}^{*}$ phase map. Here, the range of ${90}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ $\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\le}$ ${225}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ depicted a drag-dominated regime for increasing reduced frequency. However, thrust-dominated regimes were observed for $\ensuremath{\phi}<$ ${90}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$ and $\ensuremath{\phi}>$ ${225}^{\ensuremath{\circ}}$, where increasing the reduced frequency led to an increased thrust production. The isoline-depicting drag-thrust boundary was further observed to coincide with transitions in the characteristic near-wake modes with increasing reduced frequency, which ranged from $\mathrm{2P}+\mathrm{2S}$ to 2P and reverse von K\'arm\'an modes. However, evaluation of the wake with changing phase offsets at individual reduced frequencies only depicted effects on the spatial configuration of the vortex structures, while the number of vortices shed in one oscillation period was unchanged. The existence of similar wake modes with significantly different propulsive performance clearly suggests that transitions of the wake topology may not always be a reliable tool for understanding propulsive mechanisms of fish swimming or development of underwater propulsion systems. We further assessed a possible route to drag production via investigation into the mean velocity fields at increasing phase offset and at intermediate reduced frequencies ranging from 0.24 to 0.40. This revealed bifurcation of a velocity jet behind the foil on account of the wake topology and dynamics of shed vortex structures. The changes posed by increasing $\ensuremath{\phi}$ on wake structure interactions further hints at potential mechanisms that limit the achievement of optimum efficiency in underwater locomotion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".