A novel method for identifying geomechanical parameters of rock masses based on a PSO and improved GPR hybrid algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In view of the shortcomings of existing artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector regression (SVR) in the application of three-dimensional displacement back analysis, Gaussian process regression (GPR) algorithm is introduced to make up for the shortcomings of existing intelligent inversion methods. In order to improve the generality of the standard GPR algorithm with single kernel function, an improved Gaussian process regression (IGPR) algorithm with combined kernel function is proposed by adding two single kernel functions. In addition, in the training process of IGPR model, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) is combined with the IGPR model (PSO-IGPR) to optimize the parameters of the IGPR model. After the IGPR model can accurately map the relationship between geomechanical parameters and rock mass deformation, the PSO algorithm is directly used to search the best geomechanical parameters to match the deformation calculated by igpr model with the measured deformation of rock mass. The application case of Beikou tunnel shows that the combined kernel function GPR has higher identification accuracy than the single kernel function GPR and SVR model, the IGPR model with automatic correlation determination (ARD) kernel function can obtain higher identification accuracy than the IGPR model with isotropic (ISO) kernel function, and the PSO-IGPR hybrid model based on ARD kernel function has the highest identification accuracy. Therefore, this paper proposes a displacement back analysis method of the PSO-IGPR hybrid algorithm based on ARD kernel function, which can be used to identify the geomechanical parameters of rock mass and solve other engineering problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".