MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223501105 · doi:10.3389/fbuil.2022.833167

Probabilistic Fatigue Fragility Curves for Overhead Transmission Line Conductor-Clamp Assemblies

2022· article· en· W4223501105 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Built Environment · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical stress and fatigue analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies
KeywordsFrettingConductorProbabilistic logicStructural engineeringElectrical conductorEngineeringOverhead (engineering)ResidualTransmission lineElectric power transmissionDissipationCatastrophic failureMaterials scienceComputer scienceAlgorithmElectrical engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The residual life of transmission line overhead conductors under conditions of fretting fatigue is an important asset management issue for electric network operators. The current industry practice for overhead conductor residual life estimation relies heavily on experimentally generated fatigue curves or rule-based expert systems. The current experiment-based methods do not consider specific conductor-clamp configurations and are based on the simple flexion model. This approach results in large uncertainties in service life predictions and are limited to a failure criterion based on the first wire failure in the conductor. Rule-based expert systems also have limited applicability since they lack physical representation of the fretting fatigue process. Given the limitations of the current methods, the objective of this work is to propose a framework that combines physics-based models and probability theory to estimate the residual life of overhead conductors considering either single or multiple wire failure criteria. To illustrate this procedure, a finite element model of a Bersfort conductor-clamp system is used to assess the contact conditions and internal stress states in the wires of the conductor. Results from the numerical model are then used to develop a fretting fatigue criterion that is a function of the contact energy dissipation mechanisms, contact stresses, and the plain fatigue resistance of the wires. Probability of failure of each contact point between wires and between wires and clamp is computed using the fretting fatigue criterion. With this information, the most probable locations of fretting fatigue failure are identified in the conductor. The predictions for the locations of failure are validated with available literature data for the same conductor-clamp configuration. Given the probabilities of failures at each contact point, the probability of failure of the conductor is derived with the Poisson binomial distribution. Fragility curves are presented for the first through the third wire failures in the conductor. The fragility curves are validated through comparisons with available literature data on the same conductor-clamp configuration. Fatigue curves are also generated from the fragility model for the first wire failure and compared against experimentally generated fatigue curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score0.771

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it