Prolonged absorption and susceptibility to enterohepatic circulation after oral administration of ergot alkaloids in ewes.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics profile of ergot alkaloids when administered to sheep orally. Although ergot alkaloids frequently contaminate animal feed, current understanding of their pharmacokinetics in animals cannot adequately predict toxicity. Blood samples were collected from ewes at 0.5, 1, 3, 5, and 12 h after oral exposure to 4 ergot alkaloids: ergocornine, ergocristine, ergocryptine, and ergosine, followed by serum analysis of these alkaloids using high performance liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. The alkaloids showed extended absorption time, in addition to clear signs of enterohepatic circulation. This pharmacokinetic profile suggests potential enhanced toxicity in animals with disorders related to secretion of bile acid. It may also explain the high susceptibility of sheep to ergot poisoning compared to other species. An extended sampling protocol (> 12 h) is necessary, however, to identify the pharmacokinetic properties of ergot alkaloids in ewes. In conclusion, ewes exposed to ergot alkaloids showed a prolonged absorption phase and enterohepatic circulation, which is in contrast with human ergot pharmacokinetics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".