Sex-specific differences in rotarod performance and type 1 cannabinoid receptor levels in a rat model of traumatic brain injury treated with Δ <sup>9</sup> -tetrahydrocannabinol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Traumatic brain injuries (TBI) remain one of the leading causes of death and disability world-wide. One emerging area of TBI research is the involvement of the endocannabinoid system (ECS) in response to TBI. Endogenous cannabinoids modulate inflammation, pain, anxiety, and neurotransmitter release through the activation of the cannabinoid receptors CB1R and CB2R. CB1R and CB2R are activated by exogenous cannabinoids such as Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) found in Cannabis sativa . As public perceptions change in the wake of Cannabis legalization, research into the potential harmful and therapeutic effects of THC following TBI deserve exploration. In this preliminary study, we investigated sex differences in behavioral effects, CB1R abundance, and cytokine profiles in a rat model of moderate TBI treated with 1 mg·kg -1 THC ( i . p .). Neither TBI nor THC treatment altered catalepsy, body temperature, nociception, or spontaneous alternation as measured in the y-maze. TBI reduced male rotarod performance in both vehicle and THC-treated groups, and THC treatment decreased performance in Sham-TBI rats when compared to vehicle controls. Female rats that received a TBI and THC exhibited lower relative CB1R density when compared to the Sham-TBI+THC group. TBI was associated with reduced interleukin-4 in males; THC increased interleukin-6 in TBI males compared to Sham-TBI. These preliminary results highlight fundamental sex differences in the response of the ECS following TBI. Our results indicate the need for further investigation of the ECS and phytocannabinoids post-TBI in both acute and chronic phases. Significance Statement The endogenous cannabinoid system is a potential target in the pathophysiology and treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI). In this study we observed TBI reduced rotarod performance in male rats only and performance was not affected by THC. Female rats the received THC and TBI displayed lower cortical cannabinoid receptor 1 levels. These early results showcase sex differences in rodent models of TBI and the endogenous cannabinoid system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".