Post-traumatic Fungal Keratitis and Endophthalmitis Caused by <i>Coniochaeta Hoffmannii</i> with Late Recurrence following Therapeutic Full-thickness Penetrating Keratoplasty
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background To report a rare case of fungal keratitis and endophthalmitis due to Coniochaeta hoffmannii.Methods Case report.Results A 71-year-old immunocompetent male sustained a corneal laceration, traumatic cataract, and retinal detachment due to penetrating injury from a nail pulled from a wooden deck. The patient’s postoperative course was complicated by infectious keratitis. Fungal cultures, DNA sequencing and analysis of the internal transcribed spacer sequence confirmed Coniochaeta hoffmannii. Topical and oral voriconazole treatments were initiated; however, due to impending perforation, a therapeutic corneal transplant was required. One year later, the patient developed a new corneal infiltrate at the graft-host junction: Corneal scrapings were culture positive for Coniochaeta hoffmannii. This was treated with topical and intrastromal voriconazole along with oral itraconazole 200 mg once daily for 8 months.Conclusions Coniochaeta hoffmannii may cause recalcitrant keratitis and endophthalmitis, which required longstanding antifungal treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it