MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4223594033 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2022-136

Effects of climate and forest composition on soil carbon cycling, soil organic matter stability and stocks in a humid boreal region

2022· preprint· en· W4223594033 on OpenAlexafffund
David Paré, Jérôme Laganière, Guy R. Larocque, Robert D. Boutin

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaCanadian Forest Service
FundersOffice of Energy Research and DevelopmentNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceAbies balsameaSoil respirationBlack spruceSoil carbonTaigaCarbon cycleBalsamPlant litterCyclingBorealLitterEcologyAgronomyEcosystemSoil waterForestrySoil scienceBotanyBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The maintenance of the large soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks of the boreal forest under climate change is a matter of concern. In this study, major soil carbon pools and fluxes were assessed in twenty-two closed-canopy forests located along an elevation and latitudinal climatic gradient expanding 4 °C in mean annual temperature (MAT) for two important boreal conifer forest stand types: balsam fir (Abies balsamea) a fire avoider and black spruce (Picea mariana) a fire-tolerant species. SOC stocks were not influenced by climate or forest type. However, carbon fluxes, including aboveground litterfall rates as well as total soil respiration (Rs), heterotrophic (Rh) and autotrophic soil respiration (Ra) were linearly related to climate (cumulative degree days >5 °C). The sensitivity of SOM degradation to temperature, assessed by comparing Q10 (rate of change for a T increase of 10 °C) of soil respiration and Rs10 (soil respiration rates corrected to 10 °C) did not vary across the climate gradient, while the proportion of labile carbon and nitrogen showed higher values for balsam fir and for warmer sites. Balsam fir forests showed a greater litterfall rate, a better litter quality (lower C:N ratio) as well as a higher Rs10 than black spruce ones, suggesting that their soils cycle a larger amount of C and N under a similar climate regime. Altogether, these results suggest that a warmer climate and balsam fir forest composition induce a more rapid SOC turnover. Contrary to common soil organic matter stabilization hypotheses, greater SOC cycling rates did not lead to higher total SOC stocks nor to the depletion of labile soil C and N. Positive effects of warming both on fluxes to and from the soil as well as a potential saturation of stabilised SOC could explain these results which apply to the context of this study: a cold and wet environment and a stable vegetation composition along the climate gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→