Information theory characteristics improve the prediction of lithium response in bipolar disorder patients using an SVM classifier
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bipolar disorder (BD) is a mood disorder with a high morbidity and death rate. Lithium (Li), a prominent mood stabilizer, is fully effective in roughly 30% of BD patients. The remaining patients respond partially or do not respond at all. Another drug used to treat BD patients is valproate (VPA). Plenty of efforts has been made to understand how these drugs affect the patients’ neurons. We have performed electrophysiological recordings in patient-derived dentate gyrus (DG) granule neurons for three groups: control individuals, BD patients who respond to Li treatment (LR), and BD patients who do not respond to Li treatment (NR). The recordings were analyzed by the statistical tools of modern information theory, which enabled us to recognize new relationships between the electrophysiological features. These added features included the entropy of several electrophysiological measurements and the mutual information between different types of electrophysiological measurements. Information theory features provided further knowledge about the distribution of the electrophysiological entities, which improved basic classification schemes. These newly added features enabled a significant improvement in our ability to distinguish the BD patients from the control individuals (an improvement from 60% accuracy to 74% accuracy) and the Li responders from the non-responders in the BD population using Support Vector Machine (SVM) classification algorithms (an improvement from 81% accuracy to 99% accuracy). These new tools showed that LR neurons are less distinguishable from control neurons after Li treatment but not after VPA treatment, whereas NR neurons become more distinguishable from control neurons after Li treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".