Damage Accumulation Phenomena in Multilayer (TiAlCrSiY)N/(TiAlCr)N, Monolayer (TiAlCrSiY)N Coatings and Silicon upon Deformation by Cyclic Nanoindentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The micromechanism of the low-cycle fatigue of mono- and multilayer PVD coatings on cutting tools was investigated. Multilayer nanolaminate (TiAlCrSiY)N/(TiAlCr)N and monolayer (TiAlCrSiY)N PVD coatings were deposited on the cemented carbide ball nose end mills. Low-cycle fatigue resistance was studied using the cyclic nanoindentation technique. The obtained results were compared with the behaviour of the polycrystalline silicon reference sample. The fractal analysis of time-resolved curves for indenter penetration depth demonstrated regularities of damage accumulation in the coatings at the early stage of wear. The difference in low-cycle fatigue of the brittle silicon and nitride wear-resistant coatings is shown. It is demonstrated that when distinguished from the single layer (TiAlCrSiY)N coating, the nucleation and growth of microcracks in the multilayer (TiAlCrSiY)N/(TiAlCr)N coating is accompanied by acts of microplastic deformation providing a higher fracture toughness of the multilayer nanolaminate (TiAlCrSiY)N/(TiAlCr)N.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".