MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223635176 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.075005

Gravitational portals in the early Universe

2022· article· en· W4223635176 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Simon Cléry, Yann Mambrini, Keith A. Olive, Sarunas Verner

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité Paris-SaclayEuropean CommissionInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgence Nationale de la RecherchePacific Institute for Climate SolutionsUniversity of MinnesotaU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsInflatonGravitonParticle physicsDark matterGravitationStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Higgs bosonBosonDark radiationInflation (cosmology)UniversePhysics beyond the Standard ModelCosmologyMathematical physicsTheoretical physicsDark energyAstrophysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the production of matter and radiation during reheating after inflation, restricting our attention solely to gravitational interactions. Processes considered are the exchange of a graviton, ${h}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}$, involved in the scattering of the inflaton or particles in the newly created radiation bath. In particular, we consider the gravitational production of dark matter (scalar or fermionic) from the thermal bath as well as from scattering of the inflaton condensate. We also consider the gravitational production of radiation from inflaton scattering. In the latter case, we also derive a lower bound on the maximal temperature of order of ${10}^{12}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$ for a typical $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-attractor scenario from $\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\phi}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}{h}_{\ensuremath{\mu}\ensuremath{\nu}}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}$ Standard Model fields (dominated by the production of Higgs bosons). This lower gravitational bound becomes the effective maximal temperature for reheating temperatures, ${T}_{\mathrm{RH}}\ensuremath{\lesssim}{10}^{9}\text{ }\text{ }\mathrm{GeV}$. The processes we consider are all minimal in the sense that they are present in any nonminimal extension of the Standard Model theory based on Einstein gravity and cannot be neglected. We compare each of these processes to determine their relative importance in the production of both radiation and dark matter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations96
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207