MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223635528 · doi:10.1364/jocn.455539

Supervised graph convolution networks for OSNR and power estimation in optical mesh networks

2022· article· en· W4223635528 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Optical Communications and Networking · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsCiena (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolution (computer science)Electronic engineeringGraphTheoretical computer scienceArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) and received optical channel power are critical parameters in determining the quality of transmission. The OSNR and received optical channel power are influenced by network impairments such as fiber loss, amplified stimulated emission noise, and nonlinear impairments. Furthermore, environmental effects and routing, modulation, and spectrum assignment schemes influence the OSNR and thus the reach of the optical channels. These impairments and effects vary with the spectral loads that are hard to predict in brownfield networks. Several deep neural network (DNN)-based methods have been explored to estimate the OSNR and nonlinear noise. However, these methods ignore the network topology. This paper bridges this gap by leveraging supervised graph convolution neural networks (GCNs), which operate directly on graphs for OSNR and received power estimation in an optical mesh network. We also develop and implement a novel graph windowed neural network (GWinN) to reduce the over-smoothing effects of a GCN and thus learn localized behaviors like fiber cuts. We apply a DNN, GCN, and GWinN in practice to a testbed of 8 reconfigurable optical add-drop multiplexers and 22 amplifiers. Our procedure accurately estimates the OSNR with a prediction error mean and a standard deviation of ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mn>0.02</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mspace width="thickmathspace"/> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , 0.35 dB) for a reference OSNR ranging from (16 dB) to (24 dB).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.695
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it