MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223637742 · doi:10.4000/anabases.13600

Quand les feuilles du chêne de Dodone se mirent à bruire

2022· article· fr· W4223637742 on OpenAlexaff
Adeline Grand‐Clément, Sarah Rey

Bibliographic record

VenueAnabases · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClassical Antiquity Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le fonctionnement de l’oracle de Dodone reste obscur, mais on lit souvent dans les manuels d’histoire grecque que les pèlerins venaient dans ce sanctuaire épirote consulter la volonté de Zeus en écoutant le bruissement du vent dans le feuillage du chêne sacré. Un examen des sources anciennes révèle toutefois que rien ne vient confirmer cette hypothèse ; cette dernière repose vraisemblablement sur un amalgame entre des témoignages différents. Nous tentons de comprendre ici les raisons de son succès, en orientant l’enquête du côté de l’origine de l’histoire des religions, autour de la dendrolâtrie attribuée aux Anciens, puis du côté du développement d’une forme de sensibilité écologique chez les modernes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnabasesSame topicClassical Antiquity StudiesFrench-language works237,207