Outage probability analysis of a vertical underwater wireless optical link subject to oceanic turbulence and pointing errors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reliability of an underwater wireless optical communication (UWOC) network is seriously impacted by beam misalignment between transmitters (Txs) and receivers (Rxs). Also, the performance of UWOC systems can be affected by oceanic turbulence-induced fading due to fluctuations in the water refractive index as a result of variations in the pressure, water temperature, and salinity. In this work, we investigate the performance analysis of a vertical UWOC link subject to oceanic turbulence and pointing errors and further investigate the appropriate selection of link parameters to optimize link performance. This study is based on an accurate mathematical framework for link modeling while taking into account realistic Tx/Rx and channel parameters under different turbulence and beam misalignment conditions. We provide an analytical expression for calculating the link outage probability, whose accuracy is validated through numerical simulations. Last, the necessity of optimal Tx/Rx parameter selection to minimize the link outage is demonstrated. A laser beam is considered at the Tx, as well as an ultra-sensitive photodetector (silicon photo-multiplier) at the Rx to enable working at relatively long link ranges. The presented results give valuable insight into the practical aspects of deployment of UWOC networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it