Heteroatoms as Rotational Blocking Groups for Non-Fullerene Acceptors in Indoor Organic Solar Cells
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Organic solar cells are particularly attractive for indoor and low-light applications; however, photocurrents are low under these conditions, and devices are particularly sensitive to the presence of defects and trap states. A rotational blocking group is often added to non-fullerene acceptors to reduce both energetic disorder and the number of defects in the active layer. These blocking groups are most often alkyl chains, which require several synthetic steps to install; this inevitably lowers yields and increases costs. Here we report the addition of heteroatom-based blocking groups to the commonly used non-fullerene acceptor IDIC. These blocking groups are synthetically easy to install and highly effective; bromination leads to significant improvements in the efficiency of PTQ10:IDIC devices under both one-sun and low-light illumination. In contrast, thioether blocking groups improve efficiency under one-sun illumination but reduce it in dim light, highlighting the need to design and test donor:acceptor systems specifically for indoor applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it