PERAN MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGEMBANGAN WILAYAH
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indonesia consists of a vast area of land and sea, therefore the utilization of the arrangement needs to be made for the welfare of the community. At this time there are still many people who are indifferent and do not understand the essence of spatial planning. Spatial planning is contained in Law No. 26 of 2007. Regional development is the process of directing the potential of the area to be used comprehensively to realize the welfare of the community. The empowerment process is usually a combination of several mutually supportive factors. Regional development is a form of effort to build and develop regions using a spatial approach by considering socio-cultural, economic, natural, and institutional aspects in the planning framework. Regional development and spatial planning that have been planned by the government depend on the role and participation of the community. In the realization of regional development, the role of the community is very much needed in determining the success of regional development plans.
 Keywords: spatial planning, community role, regional development, regional growth
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it