MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Physical properties of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Ce</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Ru</mml:mi><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Sn</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>13</mml:mn><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math> single crystals

2022· article· lv· W4223918437 on OpenAlexafffund
Jeonghun Lee, Eundeok Mun

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Materials · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRare-earth and actinide compounds
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrical resistivity and conductivityMaterials scienceCrystal structureCrystallographyLattice (music)IonCondensed matter physicsPhysicsChemistryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single crystals of ${\mathrm{Ce}}_{3+x}{\mathrm{Ru}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{13\ensuremath{-}x}$ $(0.05\ensuremath{\le}x\ensuremath{\le}0.34)$, which adopt the cubic structure ($Pm\overline{3}n$, No. 223), have been grown with Sn flux. Thermodynamic and transport property measurements from single-crystal samples do not show any sign of magnetic ordering down to 1.8 K and indicate coexistence of the Kondo effect and crystalline electric field effect. The local minimum in the electrical resistivity and highly enhanced specific heat values at low temperatures characterize this family as a heavy fermion Kondo lattice system. A broad peak is observed at $\ensuremath{\sim}$3.5 K for $x=0.05$ in the specific heat and magnetic susceptibility, suggesting a significant Kondo contribution, and the peak disappears as $x$ increases. The evolution of physical properties of ${\mathrm{Ce}}_{3+x}{\mathrm{Ru}}_{4}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{13\ensuremath{-}x}$ compounds can be attributed to the nature of the individual Ce ions that occupy two inequivalent $2a$ and $6d$ crystallographic sites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.901
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.009
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0090.009
Research integrity0.0060.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8580.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review MaterialsSame topicRare-earth and actinide compoundsFrench-language works237,207