MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223920625 · doi:10.1137/21m1415029

Global Existence of a Solution for Isentropic Gas Flow in the Laval Nozzle with a Friction Term

2022· article· en· W4223920625 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Naoki Tsuge

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)NozzleIsentropic processMathematicsFlow (mathematics)MechanicsInvariant (physics)Mathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are concerned with isentropic gas flow in the Laval nozzle with a friction term due to viscosity. It is well known that the flow attains the sonic state at the throat, where the cross section is minimum in the Laval nozzle. However, the present friction term changes the position of the sonic state into downstream, which is called chooking. Our goal in this paper is to investigate these phenomena mathematically. From the mathematical point of view, the friction term is different from normal friction terms such as $-\alpha m$ and difficult to treat with. In spite of its physical importance, the friction term has not received much attention until now. For the case without the friction term, the global existence of a solution was obtained by the author. However, for the case with the friction term, there are only restrictive results. The most difficult point is to obtain the bounded estimate of solutions. To solve this problem, we introduce an invariant region depending on the mass. Adjusting the invariant region, we invent a new difference scheme, which yields approximate solutions including the mass.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Mathematical AnalysisSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207