MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223926453 · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.121.316235

Niche Regulation of Hematopoiesis: The Environment Is “Micro,” but the Influence Is Large

2022· review· en· W4223926453 on OpenAlexaff
Adil Rasheed

Bibliographic record

VenueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaematopoiesisNicheBone marrowCell biologyStem cellBiologyProgenitor cellImmune systemImmunologyInflammationHematopoietic stem cellBlood cellEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Immune cell production is governed by a process known as hematopoiesis, where hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) differentiate through progenitor cells and ultimately to the mature blood and immune cells found in circulation. While HSCs are capable of cell-autonomous regulation, they also rely on extrinsic factors to balance their state of quiescence and activation. These cues can, in part, be derived from the niche in which HSCs are found. Under steady-state conditions, HSCs are found in the bone marrow. This niche is designed to support HSCs but also to respond to external factors, which allows hematopoiesis to be a finely tuned and coordinated process. However, the niche, and its regulation, can become dysregulated to potentiate inflammation during disease. This review will highlight the architecture of the bone marrow and key regulators of hematopoiesis within this niche. Emphasis will be placed on how these mechanisms go awry to exacerbate hematopoietic contributions that drive cardiovascular disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular BiologySame topicHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationFrench-language works237,207