Serum Protein Signatures Using Aptamer-Based Proteomics for Minimal Change Disease and Membranous Nephropathy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Minimal change disease (MCD) and membranous nephropathy (MN) are glomerular diseases (glomerulonephritis [GN]) that present with the nephrotic syndrome. Although circulating PLA2R antibodies have been validated as a biomarker for MN, the diagnosis of MCD and PLA2R-negative MN still relies on the results of kidney biopsy or empirical corticosteroids in children. We aimed to identify serum protein biomarker signatures associated with MCD and MN pathogenesis using aptamer-based proteomics. Methods Quantitative SOMAscan proteomics was applied to the serum of adult patients with MCD ( n = 15) and MN ( n = 37) and healthy controls ( n = 20). Associations between the 1305 proteins detected with SOMAscan were assessed using multiple statistical tests, expression pattern analysis, and systems biology analysis. Results A total of 208 and 244 proteins were identified that differentiated MCD and MN, respectively, with high statistical significance from the healthy controls (Benjamin-Hochberg [BH] P < 0.0001). There were 157 proteins that discriminated MN from MCD (BH P < 0.05). In MCD, 65 proteins were differentially expressed as compared with MN and healthy controls. When compared with MCD and healthy controls, 44 discriminatory proteins were specifically linked to MN. Systems biology analysis of these signatures identified cell death and inflammation as key pathways differentiating MN from MCD and healthy controls. Dysregulation of fatty acid metabolism pathways was confirmed in both MN and MCD as compared with the healthy subjects. Conclusion SOMAscan represents a promising proteomic platform for biomarker development in GN. Validation of a greater number of discovery biomarkers in larger patient cohorts is needed before these data can be translated for clinical care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".