MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4223965544 · doi:10.1111/jocs.16531

Complete transcatheter versus complete surgical management for combined aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease: A false dichotomy?

2022· article· en· W4223965544 on OpenAlexaff
Nitish K. Dhingra, Subodh Verma, Bobby Yanagawa, Makoto Hibino

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiac Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineStenosisCoronary artery diseaseValve replacementCardiologyPercutaneousArteryInternal medicineAortic valve replacementPercutaneous coronary interventionAortic valve stenosisBypass graftingSurgeryMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coronary artery disease and aortic stenosis often occur concomitantly owing to their shared risk factor profile. While standard management of these patients has been through surgical methods including surgical aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting, recent studies have investigated the potential role of complete transcatheter management (i.e., transcatheter aortic valve implantation and percutaneous coronary intervention) for these patients. In this editorial, we discuss the growing body of evidence suggesting long-term risks of transcatheter interventions despite their short-term benefits and also look to the future of hybrid approaches for multifaceted structural heart pathologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.910

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.005
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiac SurgerySame topicCardiac Valve Diseases and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207