Container material dictates stability of bacteriophage suspensions: Light scattering and infectivity measurements reveal mechanisms of infectious titre decay
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIMS: To measure the infectious titre (IT) decay rate for various bacteriophages as a function of storage container material. Additionally, parallel light scattering and infectious titre measurements reveal distinct mechanisms for IT loss, depending on phage. METHODS AND RESULTS: loss in glass and low-binding polypropylene. Incubation of polymer containers with Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) resulted in a consistent reduction in IT decay. Aggregation state of phage suspensions was studied by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), revealing highest aggregation in glass-stored suspensions and lowest after storage in BSA-treated containers. CONCLUSIONS: Glass and 'low-binding' containers may aggravate IT decay while BSA treatment may present an easy mitigation strategy. IT versus NTA titre diagrams highlight the importance of phage inactivation in combination with aggregation. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Container material is a significant determinant of bacteriophage IT decay. It is therefore essential to confirm IT following storage and tailor choice of phage storage containers accordingly. Aggregation of phages and adsorption onto labware surfaces are not only the mechanisms accounting for IT loss but also biological instability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".