A quadruple integral involving the product of generalized parabolic cylinder functions 𝐷ᵥ(𝛽𝑥)𝐷ᵤ(𝛼𝑧): Derivation and evaluation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present document is to evaluate a quadruple integral involving the product of the generalized Parabolic Cylinder functions <inline-formula content-type="math/mathml"> <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" alttext="upper D Subscript v Baseline left-parenthesis beta x right-parenthesis upper D Subscript u Baseline left-parenthesis alpha z right-parenthesis"> <mml:semantics> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>v</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi> β </mml:mi> <mml:mi>x</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>D</mml:mi> <mml:mrow class="MJX-TeXAtom-ORD"> <mml:mi>u</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo> <mml:mi> α </mml:mi> <mml:mi>z</mml:mi> <mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> <mml:annotation encoding="application/x-tex">D_{v}(\beta x)D_{u}(\alpha z)</mml:annotation> </mml:semantics> </mml:math> </inline-formula> expressed in terms of the Hurwitz-Lerch zeta function. Special cases are evaluated in terms of fundamental constants. All the results in this work are new.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".