MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224016758 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac954

Long-term radio monitoring of the neutron star X-ray binary <i>Swift</i> J1858.6−0814

2022· article· en· W4224016758 on OpenAlexafffund
Lauren Rhodes, R. P. Fender, S. Motta, J. van den Eijnden, D. R. Williams, Joe Bright, G. R. Sivakoff

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersRIKENJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsSwiftAstrophysicsNeutron starFlareJet (fluid)Binary numberAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT We present the results of our long-term radio monitoring campaign at 1.3 GHz (MeerKAT) and 15.5 GHz (Arcminute Microkelvin Imager – Large Array, AMI-LA) for the outburst of the recently discovered neutron star X-ray binary Swift J1858.6−0814. Throughout the outburst, we observe radio emission consistent with a quasi-persistent, self-absorbed jet. In addition, we see two flares at MJD 58427 and 58530. The second flare allows us to place constraints on the magnetic field and minimum energy of the jet at 0.2 G and 5 × 1037 erg, respectively. We use the multifrequency radio data in conjunction with data from Swift-BAT (Burst Alert Telescope) to place Swift J1858.6−0814 on the radio/X-ray correlation. We find that the quasi-simultaneous radio and BAT data make Swift J1858.6−0814 appear to bridge the gap in the radio/X-ray plane between atoll and Z sources. Furthermore, AMI-LA observations made while Swift J1858.6−0814 was in the soft state have allowed us to show that the radio emission during the soft state is quenched by at least a factor of 4.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsFrench-language works237,207