MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4224019540 · doi:10.2138/am-2022-8408

The first occurrence of the carbide anion, C4–, in an oxide mineral: Mikecoxite, ideally (CHg4)OCl2, from the McDermitt open-pit mine, Humboldt County, Nevada, U.S.A.

2022· article· en· W4224019540 on OpenAlexaff
Mark A. Cooper, Gail Dunning, F. C. Hawthorne, Chi Ma, Anthony R. Kampf, John Spratt, Andrew G. Christy

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetal Extraction and Bioleaching
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclinic crystal systemChemical formulaAluniteElectron microprobeChemistryCrystallographyIonFormula unitRaman spectroscopyCrystal structureOxideStructural formulaMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)GeologyPhysicsHydrothermal circulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mikecoxite, ideally (CHg4)OCl2, is the first mercury-oxide-chloride-carbide containing a C4– anion coordinated by four Hg atoms (a permercurated methane derivative) to be described as a mineral species. It was found at the McDermitt open-pit mine on the eastern margin of the McDermitt Caldera, Humboldt County, Nevada, U.S.A. It is monoclinic, space group P21/n, Z = 4; a = 10.164(5), b = 10.490(4), c = 6.547(3) Å, V 698.0(5) Å3. Chemical analysis by electron microprobe gave Hg 86.38, Cl 11.58, Br 0.46, C 1.81, sum = 100.23 wt%, and O was detected but the signal was too weak for quantitative chemical analysis. The empirical formula, calculated on the basis of Hg + Cl + Br = 6 apfu, is (C1.19Hg3.39)(Cl2.57Br0.05)Σ2.62, and the ideal formula based on the chemical analysis and the crystal structure is (CHg4)OCl2. The seven strongest lines in the X-ray powder diffraction pattern are [d (Å), I, (hkl)]: 2.884, 100, (230); 2.989, 81, (301, 301, 112, 112, 131, 131); 2.673, 79, (122, 122, 212, 212); 1.7443, 40, (060, 432, 432); 5.49, 34, (101, 101); 4.65, 32, (120); 2.300, 30, (312, 312). The Raman spectrum shows three bands at 638, 675, and 704 cm–1, well above the range characteristic of NHg4 stretching vibrations between 540 and 580 cm–1, that are assigned to CHg4 stretching vibrations. Mikecoxite forms intergrowths of bladed crystals up to 100 μm long that occur on granular quartz or in vugs associated with kleinite. It is black with a submetallic to metallic luster and strong specular reflections and does not fluoresce under short-or long-wave ultraviolet light. Neither cleavage nor parting were observed, and the calculated density is 8.58 g/cm3. In the crystal structure of mikecoxite, (C4–Hg42+) groups link through O2– ions to form three-membered rings that polymerize into corrugated [CHg4OCl]+ layers with near-linear C4––Hg2+–O and C 4––Hg2+–Cl linkages. The layers link in the third direction directly via weak Hg2+–O2– and Hg2+–Cl– bonds to adjacent layers and also indirectly via interlayer Cl–. A bond-valence parameter has been derived for (Hg2+–C4–) bonds: Ro = 2.073 Å, b = 0.37, which gives bond-valence sums at the C4– ions in accord with the valence-sum rule. The source of carbon for mikecoxite in the volcanic high-desert environment of the type locality seems to be methane, with the reaction catalyzed by microbiota through full mercuration of carbon atoms, beyond the first stage that produces the volatile and highly mobile methylmercury, [CH3Hg]+, a potent neurotoxin that accumulates in marine food chains. Both the mineral and the mineral name have been approved by the Commission on New Minerals, Nomenclature and Classification of the International Mineralogical Association (IMA 2021-060). The mineral is named after Michael F. Cox (b. 1958), a founding member of the New Almaden Quicksilver County Park Association (NAQCPA) who was responsible for characterizing and remediating environmental mercury on-site and who recovered the rock containing the new mineral.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.209
Threshold uncertainty score0.947

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicMetal Extraction and BioleachingFrench-language works237,207