MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4224041279 · doi:10.1101/2022.04.01.486632

Microstructural alterations in tract development in college football: a longitudinal diffusion MRI study

2022· preprint· en· W4224041279 on OpenAlexaff
Maged Goubran, Brian D. Mills, Marios Georgiadis, Mahta Karimpoor, Nicole Mouchawar, Sohrab Sami, Emily L. Dennis, Carolyn Akers, Lex A. Mitchell, Brian M. Boldt, David Douglas, Phil DiGiacomo, Jarrett Rosenberg, Gerald Grant, Max Wintermark, David B. Camarillo, Michael Zeineh

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiffusion MRIConcussionFractional anisotropyFootballCorpus callosumPsychologyCingulum (brain)White matterSuperior longitudinal fasciculusMedicineFasciculusAmerican footballPhysical therapyNuclear medicineMagnetic resonance imagingAnatomyPoison controlRadiologyInjury prevention

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background and Objectives Repeated concussive and sub-concussive impacts in high-contact sports can affect the brain’s microstructure, which can be studied using diffusion MRI. Most prior imaging studies, however, employ a cross-sectional design, do not include low-contact players as controls, or use traditional diffusion tensor imaging without investigating novel tractspecific microstructural metrics. Methods We examined brain microstructure in 63 high-contact (American football) and 34 low-contact (volleyball) collegiate athletes with up to 4 years of follow-up (315 total scans) using advanced diffusion MRI, a comprehensive set of multi-compartment models, and automated fiber quantification tools. We investigated diffusion metrics along the length of tracts using nested linear mixed-effects models to ascertain the acute and chronic effects of sub-concussive and concussive impacts, as well as associations between diffusion changes with clinical, behavioral, and sports-related measures. Results Significant longitudinal increases in fractional anisotropy and axonal water fraction were detected in volleyball players, but not in football players, along with decreases in radial and mean diffusivity as well as orientation dispersion index (all findings absolute T-statistic > 3.5, p < .0001). This pattern was present in the callosum forceps minor, left superior longitudinal fasciculus, left thalamic radiation, and right cingulum hippocampus. Longitudinal group differences were more prominent and observed in a larger number of tracts in concussed (previously or in-study) football players (p < .0001), while smaller effects were noted in un-concussed players. An analysis of immediate-post concussion scans in football players demonstrated a transient localized increase in axial diffusivity, mean and radial kurtosis in the left uncinate and right cingulum hippocampus (p < .0001). Finally, football players with high position-based sub-concussive risk demonstrated increased orientation dispersion index over time (p < .0001). Discussion The observed longitudinal changes in our volleyball cohort likely reflect normal development in this age range, while the relative attenuation of these effects seen in football, and especially concussed athletes, could possibly reveal diminished myelination, altered axonal calibers, or depressed pruning processes leading to a static, non-decreasing axonal dispersion. This prospective longitudinal study demonstrates significantly divergent tract-specific trajectories of brain microstructure, possibly reflecting a concussive and/or repeated sub-concussive impact-related alteration of normal white matter development in football athletes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→